Despite seemingly mixed messages, China's great shift from easing to tightening has begun. While growth will continue to decelerate, it can still remain on the deceleration track, even as deleveraging has begun.
In May, Moody's Investor Service downgraded China's credit rating. But it took less than a day for Chinese financial markets to recover from the downgrade. Recently, index giant MSCI announced the partial inclusion of China-traded A-shares in the MSCI Emerging Market Index. After all, China is currently under-represented in global equity indices relative to its economic influence. The inclusion is predicated on a long and gradual move.
In brief, Moody's believes that the rapid rise of Chinese debt has potential to degrade its future prospects, while MSCI thinks that China's future is grossly under-valued. One focuses on the cyclical story; the other on the secular potential.
There is a reason to seemingly mixed messages: Like advanced economies, China has now a debt challenge. Yet, the context is different and so are the implications.
THE DEBT DIFFERENCE: In 2015, US total debt (private non-financial debt plus government debt) exceeded 251 per cent of the economy. Except for Germany (166 per cent), the comparable figures in other major European economies are reminiscent of those in the US, including UK (249 per cent), France (278 per cent), and Italy (253 per cent). In Japan, total debt exceeds a whopping 415 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP). In China, it was 221 per cent but it has grown very rapidly.
The numbers illustrate the stakes, but not the story. In advanced economies, total debt has accrued in the past half a century, decades following industrialisation. After rapid acceleration amid industrialisation and the move to post-industrial society, their growth has decelerated, along with excessive debt burden in the postwar era.
The advanced economies' debt is the result of high living standards that are no longer fuelled by catch-up growth and are not adequately backed up by productivity, innovation and growth. So living standards are sustained with leverage.
In China, total debt accrued in the past decade, amid industrialisation. Unlike advanced economies, different regions in China are still coping with different degrees of industrialisation. As the urbanisation rate is around 56 per cent, intensive urbanisation will continue another decade or two.
Due to differences in economic development, Chinese living standards remain significantly lower relative to advanced economies. Yet, rising living standards, which the central government hopes to double in 2010-20, are fuelled by catch-up growth and supported by productivity, innovation and growth.
In advanced economies, debt is a secular burden; in China, it is cyclical side-effect. In both, left unmanaged, it has potential to undermine future.
RAPID RISE OF CHINESE DEBT: Why did Chinese debt rise so rapidly? Even in 2008, it was still 132 per cent. Only a tenth was central government debt (17 per cent), most involved private debt (115 per cent). In 2015, government debt was about the same (16 per cent), but private debt had soared (205 per cent).
The dramatic increase can be attributed to two surges. The first is the result of the massive $585-billion stimulus package of 2009, which contributed to new infrastructure in China and to global growth prospects. But it also unleashed a huge amount of liquidity for speculation, which is today reflected by excessive local government debt (included in private non-financial debt data).
Another sharp surge followed in 2016, which saw a huge credit expansion as banks extended a record $1.8 trillion of loans. It was driven by robust mortgage growth, despite government measures to cool housing prices. As a result, credit was growing twice as fast as the growth rate.
But since late 2016 the cyclical story has been shifting.
DELEVERAGING HAS BEGUN: For years, policymakers have advocated tougher measures against leverage, which have been expected to follow the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party in the fall. The big news is that deleveraging has already begun. Concurrently, global pressures have increased with US Federal Reserve's rate hikes.
In late 2016, the People's Bank of China (PBoC) adopted a tighter monetary stance and has increased tightening in the ongoing year. In May, according to Reuters, total social financing fell to $156 billion from $200 billion, much more than analysts expected. As the decline was driven by non-bank financing, broad M2 money supply expanded by less than 10 per cent on a year-to-year basis, the weakest pace in two decades.
For now, policymakers' deleveraging is on track, as long as it does not downgrade the growth target. In China, it is a medium-term project. In advanced economies, deleveraging is likely to take far longer. But they will not succeed without structural reforms - just as China is already executing reforms to rebalance the economy toward consumption and innovation.
Dr Dan Steinbock is the founder of Difference Group and has served as research director at the India, China and America Institute (USA) and visiting fellow at the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (China) and the EU Center (Singapore). [The original version was published by China Daily on June 28, 2017.]