Loading...

Female physicians prove better care givers

| Updated: October 25, 2017 02:51:29


Female physicians prove better care givers

A new facet of women's quiet contribution to human welfare has come to light. The Havard T.H.Chan School of Public Health in the US has found out that patients under the care  of women  doctors heal better than   those cared for by their male colleagues. The finding is the result of  research  carried out on more than a million patients, many of them seriously ill, who had been treated in different US hospitals between 2011 and 2014.
The size of the research undertaking was huge as 58,344 doctors were  involved of which 18,751 were female physicians. Three things need  to be  noted  at the outset if  we are to fathom the   importance of the public health   research initiative: One, it was  broad-based and representative given the number of patients and that of years they have been under the scanner; two, it   was conducted on patients aged 65 and above implying  a concern for  cost-effective geriatric healthcare; and last but not least, it has been first- of- its- kind national study, a bit ironically in a research-crazy country like the US!
Now,what are the specific findings?The conclusions drawn from the study are  as follows: Patients treated  by female physicians  are   four per cent  less likely to die  within 30 days compared with those cared for by   male doctors. Secondly, on discharge , they  have five per cent lower risk of  readmission to the hospital within 30 days. On the face of it, the benefits of female care may sound limited but if one were to calculate percentage-based total number of beneficiaries out of more than 1.0 million patients, it would work out impressively. Especially, if we extrapolate it country-wide.
The gender of the physicians is particularly significant for the 'sickest patients'. Basically,' the findings', it is told, 'indicate that potential differences in practice pattern between male and female physicians may have important clinical implications.'  
In the US female doctors are one-third of the total  physician work force. This deficit, if met substantially, could help save 32,000 lives a year-a number compared to the annual figure of deaths from motor vehicle accidents nationally.   
In our very adverse doctor: patient ratio-3.5 physician per 10,000-we had begun with an added  disadvantage in the number of female doctors. A serious handicap lay in the shortage of nurses. Over the years, however, doctors, nurses and dentists increased in numbers so that we can say today that there are 7.7 care givers per 10,000 of our population.
Our country's situation  in terms of female medical education is becoming buoyant by each passing year. According to figures in 2014, female candidates were faring better than    males in the  admission tests. Thus, in 2013-14 session, 1602 female students enrolled in government  medical colleges compared with 11,35 males.
With female students making up 60 per cent of medical enrolment, one could see why since 2011 more women graduates have been  coming out  of medical colleges than their male counterparts. 
Whether by virtue  of the  research results disseminated    by online journal of the American Medical Association  the female doctors' access to promotion and better pay will radically improve, only time can tell. 
At any rate, it does not take a gender  expert to believe   that women's equality can add $12 trillion to global growth.
[email protected]


 

Share if you like

Filter By Topic